‘CASHLESS’ TREATMENT FOR ACCIDENT VICTIMS: INTENTIONS ARE GOOD BUT THE SYSTEM IS BAD
-In such a country, when the government says that “now anyone injured in a road accident will get free treatment up to ₹1.5 lakh for the first seven days”, it seems as if the system has put on a human face. But when we see the reality of this scheme on the ground, that face looks blurred – sometimes lost in files, sometimes stuck in the portal, and sometimes dying due to the indifference of the hospital.
‘CASHLESS’ TREATMENT FOR ACCIDENT VICTIMS: INTENTIONS ARE GOOD BUT THE SYSTEM IS BAD
29-JULY-ENG 14
RAJIV NAYAN AGRAWAL
ARA-------------------------------In such a country, when the government says that “now anyone injured in a road accident will get free treatment up to ₹1.5 lakh for the first seven days”, it seems as if the system has put on a human face. But when we see the reality of this scheme on the ground, that face looks blurred – sometimes lost in files, sometimes stuck in the portal, and sometimes dying due to the indifference of the hospital.
This cashless treatment scheme was started under section 162 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The objective was that no poor or rich person should have to dig into his pocket for treatment. At first glance, it seems that the government has understood the pain of the common man. But then the same old question arises – will the system ever be able to bridge the gap between intentions and policy?
So far, many states have not even given orders to implement this scheme. Even in developed areas like Noida and Ghaziabad, adjacent to the capital Delhi, hospitals did not know that the scheme had been started till June 2025. Isn't it funny that the scheme has been started but hospitals and doctors are searching for it like a lost traffic signal?
And even in the hospitals that are associated with the scheme, the treatment limit is ₹1.5 lakh. Now just think - can ICU, surgery, medicines, tests of a patient admitted in a serious road accident - can all this be limited to ₹1.5 lakh? Private hospitals have clearly said - "Why should we work at a loss?" And the government answers - "Deserve service!" But is Desh Seva the responsibility of doctors alone? Not of policy makers?
The portal - yes, the same portal made on the computer - seeing which even the clerk of the hospital will hold his head in confusion. Sometimes the documents are not uploaded, sometimes the form remains incomplete, and sometimes the entire claim goes into "error". Forget about the patient, even the hospital does not know whom to contact, where to get the correction done.
Everyone has different rules, different understanding, and the same confusion. Nobody knows whose job is what. It seems as if the scheme is a play in which everyone is a character, but nobody has been given a script.
What's more, sometimes the accident is so serious that the nearby hospitals are not registered with the scheme. In such a situation, they are afraid to even do "stabilization" - they are afraid that the money might get stuck! The result - the injured patient is carried from one place to another in the ambulance, and his "golden hour" - the most precious time to save life - is spent on the way.
The public does not know that there is such a scheme. On seeing an injured woman lying on the road, people take out their camera, but are unable to tell the name of the scheme for treatment. Even the staff working in the hospital does not know how to implement the scheme. Will the benefit of the scheme be received when the beneficiary does not even know that he is a beneficiary? The humor deepens when the government offers a reward of up to ₹25,000 under the 'Rahveer Yojana' for helping an injured person — but people are limited to radio or government posters about the scheme. On social media, where people are seen dancing and singing, the scheme is invisible.
A lot needs to be done to make the scheme successful on the ground. First of all — state governments should give up laziness and give clear guidelines. Registration of hospitals should be made mandatory within a clear time frame. The example of Indore is good where hospitals were included in the scheme within three days in June 2025.
Secondly, the financial limit of the scheme should be decided according to the actual medical costs. If the government wants to save lives, then why is it pushing hospitals into losses?
Thirdly, the portal must be saved from becoming a joke of “Digital India”. It should be made simple, clear and technically capable. The claim process should be transparent — so that the hospital gets the payment on time, and the patient gets relief.
Along with this, non-registered hospitals should also be given the right to stabilization and payment guarantee. This will increase the chances of survival.
Finally – Awareness: The public should know that every life lying on the road is linked to a scheme. From posters to mobile messages, from schools to panchayats – information about this scheme should be given everywhere. Because only when the public knows, the hospitals will be accountable.
This cashless treatment scheme, if implemented in true sense, can reduce the mortality rate related to road accidents in India to a great extent. But as long as this scheme remains only on paper, it will remain just another ‘scheme’ – which will shine in slogans, but will remain oblivious to the blood shed on the road.
Blood flows on the roads of this country – and the system waits for the portal to load.
What's Your Reaction?
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Angry
0
Sad
0
Wow
0



