IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONTENT CREATOR AND A JOURNALIST

-It is essential to distinguish between a content creator and a journalist; there are growing demands for action against those who use a fabricated identity to exert undue pressure. Amid the expanding influence of social media, the field of content creation is growing rapidly. Through mobile phones and the internet, individuals are establishing their own identities by producing videos, sharing news, and highlighting local issues—a significant form of digital expression. However, this raises a serious question: is everyone who creates content on social media a journalist? Is it enough to simply spend a small sum to get an ID card printed or to display the word 'Press' on one's vehicle? In reality, journalism is not limited to an ID card, a camera, a microphone, or the word 'Press' written on a vehicle.

Tuesday, October 27, 2026 - 12:35
0
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONTENT CREATOR AND A JOURNALIST

IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONTENT CREATOR AND A JOURNALIST

27-OCT-ENG 7

RAJIV NAYAN AGRAWAL

BUXAR-------------------------It is essential to distinguish between a content creator and a journalist; there are growing demands for action against those who use a fabricated identity to exert undue pressure. Amid the expanding influence of social media, the field of content creation is growing rapidly. Through mobile phones and the internet, individuals are establishing their own identities by producing videos, sharing news, and highlighting local issues—a significant form of digital expression. However, this raises a serious question: is everyone who creates content on social media a journalist? Is it enough to simply spend a small sum to get an ID card printed or to display the word 'Press' on one's vehicle? In reality, journalism is not limited to an ID card, a camera, a microphone, or the word 'Press' written on a vehicle. It is a profession rooted in responsibility, fact-checking, impartiality, public interest, and accountability. When these fundamental standards are ignored, it not only undermines the credibility of journalism but also fuels complaints among the public. At the local level, there have been reports of individuals posing as journalists—having obtained ID cards at a minimal cost and labeling their vehicles with the word 'Press.' It is alleged that some of these individuals exert unnecessary pressure under the guise of gathering information regarding schools, hospitals, or government construction projects.

In some instances, there have also been complaints of inappropriate behavior toward small shopkeepers and vegetable vendors.

If an individual uses the identity of a journalist to intimidate others, secure unfair advantages, or serve personal interests, it becomes a matter of serious concern. However, in such cases, an impartial investigation into the allegations is essential; an individual cannot be deemed in the wrong simply for being a content creator or for producing news independently.

A content creator produces material for social media—ranging from entertainment and information to reviews or other topics. In contrast, the role of a journalist involves verifying facts, seeking perspectives from relevant parties, investigating issues of public interest, and presenting information responsibly. While both roles can be significant, it is inappropriate to equate them.

A content creator can certainly contribute to journalism through diligent effort, fact-based reporting, and a responsible approach. Conversely, merely possessing an ID card from an organization does not automatically make an individual an impartial and credible journalist. The true benchmarks are the quality of work, integrity, and accountability.

In a democracy, the media plays a vital role by raising questions regarding road construction, schools, hospitals, and government schemes. Yet, there is a distinction between asking questions and leveling accusations. An individual reporting on the quality of road construction should strive to understand the relevant standards, available documentation, and technical facts. Similarly, when addressing matters concerning schools or hospitals, it is essential to seek a response from the concerned parties and verify the facts.

Declaring an institution guilty without sufficient information, disseminating videos based on incomplete data, or raising questions solely to create a sensation cannot be classified as journalism in the public interest. In journalism, the responsibility to be factually accurate is just as significant as the right to ask questions.

When an individual displays the word "Press" on their vehicle or claims to be a journalist, it can sometimes be challenging for the police and administration to ascertain their actual role. In such instances, it is necessary for the relevant authorities to verify the individual's identity and claims in accordance with established procedures. If evidence of forged documents, fraud, intimidation, or other illegal activities emerges, action must be taken in accordance with the law. It is also important to note that there is no single, mandatory government-issued card that defines one’s status as a journalist. A press card, an organizational ID, or a 'Press' sticker on a vehicle does not, in itself, confer any special legal rights upon an individual. Any action taken should be based on an individual's actual conduct and the available evidence, rather than merely on their stated profession or their presence on social media. Who bears the responsibility for safeguarding the credibility of genuine journalists?

The alleged misconduct of a few individuals can tarnish the reputation of journalists who have spent years dedicated to factual reporting, addressing public grievances, and ensuring administrative accountability. Maintaining the credibility of journalism requires the collective effort of media organizations, journalists' associations, the administration, and journalists themselves.

Media organizations must ensure that the identities of their representatives are clearly established. Journalists' associations should emphasize professional conduct and ethical standards. Meanwhile, the administration should conduct impartial investigations upon receiving complaints—ensuring that the work of legitimate journalists is not unnecessarily hindered, while taking appropriate legal action against those who exploit the guise of journalism for personal gain.

Conclusion: Journalism is not a mere facade; it is a responsibility rooted in public trust. It is essential to distinguish between content creation and journalism, and to foster responsible conduct in both fields. Far more significant than an ID card or a 'Press' sticker on a vehicle is the level of honesty, impartiality, and factual integrity an individual brings to their work.

What is your opinion? Should those who allegedly use the guise of journalism to intimidate others be identified and held accountable based on evidence? Please share your thoughts in the comments.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0

Comments (0)

User